Source: The New York Times
Author: Claudia Dreifus, October 27, 2014
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/28/science/naomi-oreskes-imagines-the-future-history-of-climate-change.html?ref=science&_r=0
Naomi Oreskes is a historian at Harvard University, as well as a geologist. When she took the plunge into climate change, she wasn't aware of the splash she would make. In the beginning, Naomi had believed like most of America in 2004 that the facts pertaining to climate change were inconclusive. The way the data and articles had led her and most of America to believe that not all scientists were convinced of climate change, let alone had definitive or any proof for that matter. However, while researching for a book on oceanography she looked at 1,000 articles published in a peer reviewed scientific literature in the past 10 years. Now, in the interview with Dreifus, she discovered that not a single scientist disagreed that the increase in global temperatures in the last 50 years was due to the increase in green house gasses. She then published her findings in Science, which was titled "The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change," which gained a great amount of publicity, and even Al Gore mentioned it (with negative connotations). Five years later, she ditched the oceanography book, and published a book on climate change with another scientist named Erik Conway.
Now, Naomi says that the battle is not about science, but rather economics. When it comes down to it, most people can probably acknowledge the increased changes of the Earth, but if this threatens their money, then there is no argument really there. Money trumps change. However, Naomi says that today, more people are willing to deal with the problem, stating that 70-80% of the American public is ready to deal with this very real problem, politics now standing in the way. By the end of the interview, Oreskes speaks about how she thought we would have cut down in our intake of fossil fuels, but as we have, in fact increased, there are real challenges that lay ahead.